Vulnerability | Breaking Cybersecurity News | The Hacker News

Everyone seems to have announced a clearinghouse over the past few weeks. We did too. Ours is called Athena , and the main thing that sets it apart is that it was already real and running when we announced it — built quietly months earlier, heads down, taking findings and shipping fixes, because customers kept asking us to. We only announced it now because everyone else started announcing theirs, and staying quiet started to look like something it wasn't. The others arrived louder and, as far as anyone outside the press releases could tell, didn't exist yet. Here's the part none of those announcements will tell you: the clearinghouse is the least important thing to build. When a project we'd deliberately kept private, a  five-billion-dollar press release , and  the White House all reach for the same word inside a few weeks, that's not a trend. Trends are optional. This is the shape of a problem changing under everyone at once. So let me explain why these thin...

Microsoft has released security updates for a Defender vulnerability known as RoguePlanet, nearly a month after details of the flaw became public. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-50656 (CVSS score: 7.8), is a privilege escalation issue in the Microsoft Malware Protection Engine ("mpengine.dll"), which provides scanning, detection, and cleaning capabilities for its antivirus and antispyware software. The issue has been remediated in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine version 1.1.26060.3008, along with defense-in-depth updates to harden unspecified security-related features.  RoguePlanet was first disclosed by a security researcher named Chaotic Eclipse (aka Nightmare-Eclipse), describing it as a race condition that could be abused to spawn a shell with SYSTEM-level privileges. This, in turn, grants the attacker the ability to run arbitrary code or perform unauthorized actions. The exploit has been found to work on systems running up-to-date versions of Wind...

Ask an AI coding agent to scan open-source code for security holes, and it might run the attacker's code on your own machine instead. That is the finding in a  proof-of-concept published Wednesday by the AI Now Institute, an attack it calls " Friendly Fire. " It works against Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex when either is running in an autonomous mode that approves its own commands. It hijacks the exact job these tools are sold for: checking untrusted third-party code for problems. Instead of catching the threat, the agent becomes the way in. Researchers Boyan Milanov and Heidy Khlaaf tested two setups, each a stock install with the autonomous mode switched on: Claude Code (CLI 2.1.116, 2.1.196, 2.1.198, 2.1.199) on Claude Sonnet 4.6, Sonnet 5, or Opus 4.8 OpenAI Codex (CLI 0.142.4) on GPT-5.5 Claude Code's "auto-mode" and Codex's "auto-review" use a classifier to run commands the agent judges safe, pausing ...

Researchers at  Wiz  found that a flaw in six popular AI coding assistants lets a booby-trapped code project quietly take control of a developer's computer. The assistant asks permission to edit one harmless-looking file, but the write lands on a sensitive one instead. The affected tools are Amazon Q Developer, Anthropic's Claude Code, Augment, Cursor, Google Antigravity, and Windsurf. Wiz calls the pattern GhostApproval and published it on July 8. Three of the six have shipped fixes, two have not, and Anthropic disputes that it is a bug. The most exposed are the tools that change files before you can weigh in. How the attack works The attack abuses an old Unix feature called a symbolic link , or symlink , that the assistants fail to check. A symlink quietly points to another file elsewhere on disk, so writing to it actually writes to the target. Wiz built a malicious repository with a symlink named project_settings.json that really points to the victim's ...

AI coding assistants have a habit of making things up. Ask one to fetch a popular tool, and it will sometimes hand back a real-sounding name for a project that does not exist. New research, which its authors call  HalluSquatting , turns that habit into an attack: work out the fake names an AI reliably invents, register them first, and wait for the assistant to fetch your trap on a user's behalf. Anyone whose AI assistant can fetch an outside resource and then run commands with little human review is exposed. In tests, that path led the assistant to run attacker-supplied code on the machine. Repeat it with a popular enough resource, and one planted name can reach many machines, which is why the researchers frame it as a way to assemble a botnet. How it works The attack chains two AI quirks. The first is a  hallucination : an AI making something up and presenting it as real. The second is a  prompt injection : a booby-trapped instruction that hijacks the AI, so i...