vulnerability management | Breaking Cybersecurity News | The Hacker News

Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview has dominated security discussions since its April 7 announcement. Early reporting describes a powerful cybersecurity-focused AI system capable of identifying vulnerabilities at scale and raising serious questions about how quickly organizations can validate, prioritize, and remediate what it finds. The debate that followed has mostly focused on the right questions: Is this a step-change or an incremental advance? Does restricting access to Microsoft, Apple, AWS, and JPMorgan actually reduce risk, or does it just concentrate defensive advantage among the already-well-defended? What happens when adversaries—state actors, criminal enterprises—build equivalent capability? These are important. But there's a quieter operational problem that's getting less airtime, and it's the one that will actually determine whether most organizations survive this shift.  The Discovery-to-Remediation Gap The Mythos announcement, and the broader AI security...

Imagine a world where hackers don't sleep, don't take breaks, and find weak spots in your systems instantly. Well, that world is already here. Thanks to AI, attackers are now launching automated, large-scale exploits faster than ever before. The time you have to fix a vulnerability before it gets attacked is shrinking to zero. We call this the Collapsing Exploit Window , and it means your standard patching routine is officially too slow. If you are fighting AI-speed attacks with manual-speed defenses, your systems are at a breaking point. It’s time to rethink everything. Join our highly anticipated webinar featuring expert guest Ofer Gayer, Vice President of Product at Miggo Security, and learn how to beat the bots at their own game: Mythos and the Collapsing Exploit Window: Rethink Vulnerability Prioritization at AI Speed . Here is exactly what you will walk away with: The Truth About Mythos: We are cutting through the hype. Learn what Mythos actually represents and w...

Last week, Anthropic announced Project Glasswing, an AI model so effective at discovering software vulnerabilities that they took the extraordinary step of postponing its public release. Instead, the company has given access to Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and a coalition of others to find and patch bugs before adversaries can . Mythos Preview, the model that led to Project Glasswing, found vulnerabilities across every major operating system and browser. Some of these bugs had survived decades of human audits, aggressive fuzzing, and open-source scrutiny. One had been sitting for 27 years  in  OpenBSD,  generally considered to be one of the world’s most secure operating systems. It's tempting to file this under " AI lab says their AI is too dangerous, " the same playbook OpenAI ran with GPT-2.  Not so fast; there's a material difference this time.  Mythos didn't just find individual CVEs.  It chained four independent bugs into an exploit sequen...

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Monday added eight new vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities ( KEV ) catalog, including three flaws impacting Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, citing evidence of active exploitation. The list of vulnerabilities is as follows - CVE-2023-27351 (CVSS score: 8.2) - An improper authentication vulnerability in PaperCut NG/MF that could allow an attacker to bypass authentication on affected installations via the SecurityRequestFilter class. CVE-2024-27199 (CVSS score: 7.3) - A relative path traversal vulnerability in JetBrains TeamCity that could allow an attacker to perform limited admin actions. CVE-2025-2749 (CVSS score: 7.2) - A path traversal vulnerability in Kentico Xperience that could allow an authenticated user's Staging Sync Server to upload arbitrary data to path relative locations. CVE-2025-32975 (CVSS score: 10.0) - An improper authentication vulnerability in Quest KACE Systems Ma...

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has announced changes to the way it handles cybersecurity vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs) listed in its National Vulnerability Database (NVD), stating it will only enrich those that fulfil certain conditions owing to an explosion in CVE submissions. "CVEs that do not meet those criteria will still be listed in the NVD but will not automatically be enriched by NIST ," it said . "This change is driven by a surge in CVE submissions, which increased 263% between 2020 and 2025. We don’t expect this trend to let up anytime soon." The prioritization criteria outlined by NIST, which went into effect on April 15, 2026, are as follows - CVEs appearing in the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. CVEs for software used within the federal government. CVEs for critical software as defined by Executive Order 14028: this includes soft...

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Monday added half a dozen security flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities ( KEV ) catalog, citing evidence of active exploitation. The list of vulnerabilities is as follows - CVE-2026-21643 (CVSS score: 9.1) -  An SQL injection vulnerability in  Fortinet FortiClient EMS that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. CVE-2020-9715 (CVSS score: 7.8) - A use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat Reader that could result in remote code execution. CVE-2023-36424 (CVSS score: 7.8) - An out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Common Log File System Driver that could result in privilege escalation. CVE-2023-21529 (CVSS score: 8.8) - A deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Exchange Server that could allow an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution.  CVE-2025-60...

The cybersecurity landscape is accelerating at an unprecedented rate. What is emerging is not simply a rise in the number of vulnerabilities or tools, but a dramatic increase in speed. Speed of attack, speed of exploitation, and speed of change across modern environments. This is the defining challenge of the new era of digital warfare: the weaponization of Artificial Intelligence. Threat actors, from nation-states to sophisticated criminal enterprises, are no longer just attacking. They are automating the entire kill chain. In this AI arms race, traditional defensive strategies are no longer sufficient. Periodic point-in-time assessments, manual triage, and human-speed response were already under pressure in fast-moving environments. Against AI-enabled adversaries, they are increasingly inadequate. Solutions like PlexTrac are built to help organizations move beyond fragmented findings, disconnected tools, and slow manual workflows by unifying exposure management, remediation, and...

A new analysis of endpoint detection and response (EDR) killers has revealed that 54 of them leverage a technique known as bring your own vulnerable driver ( BYOVD ) by abusing a total of 35 vulnerable drivers. EDR killer programs have been a common presence in ransomware intrusions as they offer a way for affiliates to neutralize security software before deploying file-encrypting malware. This is done so in an attempt to evade detection. "Ransomware gangs, especially those with ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) programs, frequently produce new builds of their encryptors, and ensuring that each new build is reliably undetected can be time-consuming," ESET researcher Jakub Souček said in a report shared with The Hacker News. "More importantly, encryptors are inherently very noisy (as they inherently need to modify a large number of files in a short period); making such malware undetected is rather challenging." EDR killers act as a specialized, external component...

Security teams today are not short on tools or data. They are overwhelmed by both.  Yet within the terabytes of alerts, exposures, and misconfigurations – security teams still struggle to understand context:  Q: Which exposures, misconfigurations, and vulnerabilities chain together to create viable attack paths to crown jewels? Even the most mature security teams can’t answer that easily. The problem isn't the tools. It's that the tools don’t talk to each other.  This is precisely the problem Gartner's Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture (CSMA) framework was designed to solve – and it's what Mesh Security has operationalized with the world's first purpose-built CSMA platform. In this article, we’ll walk through what CSMA is and how Mesh CSMA:  Discovers attack paths to crown jewels Prioritizes based on active threats  Eliminates attack paths systematically What Is CSMA, and Why Does It Matter Now? Before we dive into the platform, let’s clarify what C...

If you run security at any reasonably complex organization, your validation stack probably looks something like this: a BAS tool in one corner. A pentest engagement, or maybe an automated pentesting product, in another. A vulnerability scanner feeding an attack surface management platform somewhere else. Each tool gives you a slice of the picture. None of them talks to each other in any meaningful way. Meanwhile, adversaries do not attack in silos. A real intrusion might chain together an exposed identity, a cloud misconfiguration, a missed detection opportunity, and an unpatched vulnerability in a single operation. Attackers understand that your environment is an interconnected system. Unfortunately, most validation programs are still treating it as a set of disparate, disconnected parts. This isn't a minor inefficiency. It's a structural blind spot. And it's lasted for years because the market has treated every validation discipline as a separate category, with its own...

You can't control when the next critical vulnerability drops. You can control how much of your environment is exposed when it does. The problem is that most teams have more internet-facing exposure than they realise. Intruder's Head of Security digs into why this happens and how teams can manage it deliberately. Time-to-exploit is shrinking The larger and less controlled your attack surface is, the more opportunities exist for exploitation. And the window to act on them is shrinking fast. For the most serious vulnerabilities, disclosure to exploitation can be as short as 24 to 48 hours. Zero Day Clock projects that time-to-exploit will be just minutes by 2028. That's not a lot of time when you consider what has to happen before a patch is deployed: running scans, waiting for results, raising tickets, agreeing priorities, implementing applies to ’the fix’ too, happy to drop ‘verifying’ if that’s easier. If disclosure lands out of hours, it takes even longer. In many c...

We’ve all seen this before: a developer deploys a new cloud workload and grants overly broad permissions just to keep the sprint moving. An engineer generates a "temporary" API key for testing and forgets to revoke it. In the past, these were minor operational risks, debts you’d eventually pay down during a slower cycle. In 2026, “Eventually” is Now But today, within minutes, AI-powered adversarial systems can find that over-permissioned workload, map its identity relationships, and calculate a viable route to your critical assets. Before your security team has even finished their morning coffee, AI agents have simulated thousands of attack sequences and moved toward execution. AI compresses reconnaissance, simulation, and prioritization into a single automated sequence. The exposure you created this morning can be modeled, validated, and positioned inside a viable attack path before your team has lunch. The Collapse of the Exploitation Window Historically, the exploita...

Security, IT, and engineering teams today are under relentless pressure to accelerate outcomes, cut operational drag, and unlock the full potential of AI and automation. But simply investing in tools isn’t enough. 88% of AI proofs-of-concept never make it to production, even though 70% of workers cite freeing time for high-value work as the primary AI automation motivation. Real impact comes from intelligent workflows that combine automation, AI-driven decisioning, and human ingenuity into seamless processes that work across teams and systems.  In this article, we’ll highlight three use cases across Security and IT that can serve as powerful starting points for your intelligent workflow program. For each use case, we’ll share a pre-built workflow to help you tackle real bottlenecks in your organization with automation while connecting directly into your existing tech stack. These use cases are great starting points to help you turn theory into practice and achieve measurable gai...

Intentionally vulnerable training applications are widely used for security education, internal testing, and product demonstrations. Tools such as OWASP Juice Shop, DVWA, Hackazon, and bWAPP are designed to be insecure by default, making them useful for learning how common attack techniques work in controlled environments. The issue is not the applications themselves, but how they are often deployed and maintained in real-world cloud environments. Pentera Labs examined how training and demo applications are being used across cloud infrastructures and identified a recurring pattern: applications intended for isolated lab use were frequently found exposed to the public internet, running inside active cloud accounts, and connected to cloud identities with broader access than required. Deployment Patterns Observed in the Research Pentera Labs research found that these applications were often deployed with default configurations, minimal isolation, and overly permissive cloud roles. T...

January 5, 2026, Seattle, USA — ZAST.AI announced the completion of a $6 million Pre-A funding round. This investment came from the well-known investment firm Hillhouse Capital, bringing ZAST.AI's total funding close to $10 million. This marks a recognition from leading capital markets of a new solution: ending the era of high false positive rates in security tools and making every alert genuinely actionable. In 2025, ZAST.AI discovered hundreds of zero-day vulnerabilities across dozens of popular open-source projects. These findings were submitted through authoritative vulnerability platforms like VulDB, successfully resulting in 119 CVE assignments . These are not laboratory targets, but production-grade code supporting global businesses. Affected well-known projects include widely used components and frameworks such as Microsoft Azure SDK, Apache Struts XWork, Alibaba Nacos, Langfuse, Koa, node-formidable, and others. It was precisely within these widely adopted open-source p...

A study by OMICRON has revealed widespread cybersecurity gaps in the operational technology (OT) networks of substations, power plants, and control centers worldwide. Drawing on data from more than 100 installations, the analysis highlights recurring technical, organizational, and functional issues that leave critical energy infrastructure vulnerable to cyber threats. The findings are based on several years of deploying OMICRON’s intrusion detection system (IDS) StationGuard in protection, automation, and control (PAC) systems. The technology, which monitors network traffic passively, has provided deep visibility into real-world OT environments. The results underscore the growing attack surface in energy systems and the challenges operators face in securing aging infrastructure and complex network architectures. Connection of an IDS in PAC systems (circles indicate mirror ports) StationGuard deployments, often carried out during security assessments, revealed vulnerabilities su...

Cybersecurity teams increasingly want to move beyond looking at threats and vulnerabilities in isolation. It’s not only about what could go wrong (vulnerabilities) or who might attack (threats), but where they intersect in your actual environment to create real, exploitable exposure. Which exposures truly matter? Can attackers exploit them? Are our defenses effective? Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) can provide a useful approach to the cybersecurity teams in their journey towards unified threat/vulnerability or exposure management. What CTEM Really Means CTEM, as defined by Gartner, emphasizes a ‘continuous’ cycle of identifying, prioritizing, and remediating exploitable exposures across your attack surface, which improves your overall security posture as an outcome. It’s not a one-off scan and a result delivered via a tool; it’s an operational model built on five steps: Scoping – assess your threats and vulnerabilities and identify what’s most important: assets, ...

Gartner® doesn’t create new categories lightly. Generally speaking, a new acronym only emerges when the industry's collective "to-do list" has become mathematically impossible to complete. And so it seems that the introduction of the Exposure Assessment Platforms (EAP) category is a formal admission that traditional Vulnerability Management (VM) is no longer a viable way to secure a modern enterprise. The shift from the traditional Market Guide for Vulnerability Assessment to the new Magic Quadrant for EAPs represents a move away from the "vulnerability hose", i.e., the endless stream of CVEs, and toward a model of Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) . To us, this is more than just a change in terminology; it is an attempt to solve the "Dead End" paradox that has plagued security teams for a decade. In the inaugural Magic Quadrant report of this category, Gartner evaluated 20 vendors for their ability to support continuous discovery, ris...

Vulnerability management is a core component of every cybersecurity strategy. However, businesses often use thousands of software without realising it (when was the last time you checked?), and keeping track of all the vulnerability alerts, notifications, and updates can be a burden on resources and often leads to missed vulnerabilities.  Taking into account that nearly 10% of vulnerabilities were exploited in 2024, a multitude of possible – detrimental – breaches could occur if immediate remediation doesn’t take place. Businesses need a service that delivers relevant and actionable vulnerability information as soon as possible, saving your business valuable time and resources. Traditional vulnerability management products are often expensive and come with a suite of services, many of which are not needed by businesses, especially those on a budget. A Smarter Way to Track Vulnerabilities SecAlerts is streamlined, easy-to-use, affordable and works in the background 24/7. It ma...

If you're using community tools like Chocolatey or Winget to keep systems updated, you're not alone. These platforms are fast, flexible, and easy to work with—making them favorites for IT teams. But there’s a catch... The very tools that make your job easier might also be the reason your systems are at risk. These tools are run by the community. That means anyone can add or update packages. Some packages may be old, missing safety checks, or changed by mistake or on purpose. Hackers look for these weak spots. This has already happened in places like NPM and PyPI. The same risks can happen with Windows tools too. To help you patch safely without slowing down, there’s a free webinar coming up . It’s led by Gene Moody, Field CTO at Action1 . He’ll walk through how these tools work, where the risks are, and how to protect your systems while keeping updates on track. In this session, he’ll test how safe these tools really are. You’ll get practical steps you can use right away—n...