Identity Prioritization isn't a Backlog Problem - It's a Risk Math Problem
Feb 24, 2026
Identity Security / Enterprise Security
Most identity programs still prioritize work the way they prioritize IT tickets: by volume, loudness, or “what failed a control check.” That approach breaks the moment your environment stops being mostly-human and mostly-onboarded. In modern enterprises, identity risk is created by a compound of factors: control posture, hygiene, business context, and intent. Any one of these can perhaps be manageable on its own. The real danger is the toxic combination, when multiple weaknesses align and attackers get a clean chain from entry to impact. A useful prioritization framework treats identity risk as contextual exposure, not configuration completeness. 1. Controls Posture: Compliance and Security As Risk Signals, Not Checkboxes Controls posture answers a simple question: If something goes wrong, will we prevent it, detect it, and prove it? In classic IAM programs, controls are assessed as “configured / not configured.” But prioritization needs more nuance: a missing control is a risk ...