Material Security | Breaking Cybersecurity News | The Hacker News

Picture this: you've hardened every laptop in your fleet with real‑time telemetry, rapid isolation, and automated rollback. But the corporate mailbox—the front door for most attackers—is still guarded by what is effectively a 1990s-era filter. This isn't a balanced approach. Email remains a primary vector for breaches, yet we often treat it as a static stream of messages instead of a dynamic, post-delivery environment. This environment is rich with OAuth tokens, shared drive links, and years of sensitive data. The conversation needs to shift. We should stop asking, "Did the gateway block the bad thing?" and start asking, "How quickly can we see, contain, and undo the damage when an attacker inevitably gets in?" Looking at email security through this lens forces a fundamental shift toward the same assume-breach, detect-and-respond mindset that already revolutionized endpoint protection. The day the wall crumbled Most security professionals know the statisti...

Every Google Workspace administrator knows how quickly Google Drive becomes a messy sprawl of loosely shared confidential information. This isn't anyone's fault; it's inevitable as your productivity suite is purposefully designed to enable real-time collaboration – both internally and externally.  For Security & Risk Management teams, the untenable risk of any Google Drive footprint lies in the toxic combinations of sensitive data, excessive permissions, and improper sharing. However, it can be challenging to differentiate between typical business practices and potential risks without fully understanding the context and intent.  Material Security, a company renowned for its innovative method of protecting sensitive data within employee mailboxes, has recently launched  Data Protection for Google Drive  to safeguard the sprawl of confidential information scattered throughout Google Drive with a powerful discovery and remediation toolkit. How Material Security ...