Incident Response | Breaking Cybersecurity News | The Hacker News

OT incidents rarely start with "OT attacks." They start with ordinary enterprise weaknesses: shared credentials, remote access shortcuts, management systems that bridge zones too easily, and monitoring that stops short of operations.  When those weaknesses line up, an initial IT compromise becomes an OT event, and the deciding factor is no longer whether the activity is detected, but whether the environment can be contained and recovered without extended outage. What matters is that these failure patterns repeat across industries, which means they can be anticipated and solved - but only if recovery is treated as a security control, not an afterthought. Recurring OT Security Patterns Across Industries Sygnia is a premier cyber technology and services company, with extensive experience helping organisations' IT/OT environments respond to cyber incidents and strengthen enterprise-wide cyber security..  Across numerous OT security assessments, adversary simulations, and inc...

Insider threats are rising in both number and cost, forcing security teams to seek stronger cybersecurity solutions. At the same time, IT teams face more frequent audits and more complex data security requirements. Add to this a distributed workforce and third-party contractors, and it's clear why managing privileged access and monitoring user activity is so challenging.  Modern cybersecurity solutions must offer streamlined access management, complete oversight of user activity within your network, and a privacy-first approach to monitoring. This article offers practical tips on enhancing your cybersecurity strategy by addressing these three pillars. We'll also explore how Syteca's new release can help security leaders protect sensitive data, secure access, and improve audit readiness without IT overhead.  Monitoring User Activity while Preserving Their Privacy Keeping a close watch on user actions is critical for insider threat defense, but it raises a dilemma: "...

AI SOC Agents are going through a hype cycle. If we're going by Gartner's Hype Cycle for Security Operations, 2025 , this technology is still an "Innovation Trigger", but it's at the cusp of "Peak of Inflated Expectations". Every vendor claims their solution will revolutionize security operations. Every conference features another keynote promising autonomous defense. And every CISO is being asked whether AI will replace their security team. At Redis, implementing AI in the SOC has been more of a measured journey. The model is more of a hybrid SOC, so there's a combination of external service providers as well as internal resources. In this case, Prophet Security is currently proving themselves alongside a more traditional MDR provider.  But let's take a step back.  The Tipping Point for AI Adoption within the SOC Considering an AI solution for Redis' SOC came down to the confluence of three drivers.  On an individual level, there was more value from AI tools an...

For nearly two decades, managed-security models have defined how most organizations handle detection and response. Faced with alert overload, chronic staffing shortages, and the high cost of 24/7 coverage, many teams turned to Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) and later to Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors to fill the gap. Beyond staffing and capacity, many also lacked in-house expertise in building detection systems. It was a rational choice. MSSPs and MDRs provided 24/7 monitoring, experienced analysts, and predictable coverage. They gave companies without an in-house SOC a viable way to maintain security coverage in an increasingly complex threat landscape. But the ground has shifted. AI-driven SOC platforms are now automating large parts of what human analysts once did: triaging alerts, correlating signals, enriching incidents, and recommending or even executing responses. That raises a simple but profound question: what happens to the managed-security m...

For most of its history, the Security Operations Center (SOC) has been a privilege of the few. Building one meant millions in technology spend and round-the-clock analyst coverage. Unsurprisingly, for years, SOCs were a privilege of the few -  large enterprises and organizations with high-risk profiles, where budgets and scale justified the investment. Everyone else was left with partial coverage or had to outsource. That reality is changing. AI has flipped the SOC equation. What was once out of reach for all but the largest enterprises is now accessible and affordable for nearly every company that needs one. The risk every company faces By now, almost any 9-year-old knows that cyberattacks threaten every company . It's no longer just banks and financial giants in the crosshairs. Over the past decade, cyberattacks have expanded into every sector, from e-commerce sites to research institutes to local hospitals. Recent data from the 'VikingCloud 2025 SMB Threat Landscape' repo...

These days, there are plenty of ways to run DDoS simulation testing and make sure you're protected against attacks. You can do it on your own using commercial software or open-source tools—whatever works best for you. That said, there are a few must-haves when it comes to running DDoS tests. For one, you'll need a platform that allows you to easily start and stop attack simulations as needed. Plus, don't forget to notify and get approval from relevant parties, such as your cloud provider or tool vendor, before you begin testing. Beyond these basics, there are some best practices that can help you get the most out of your  DDoS testing . 1 – Plan tests to validate the protection of your most critical assets  While it may be easier to run black box testing (basically launching attacks without looking at the internal structure, architecture, and configuration of your protection), a white box testing approach is much more effective when it comes to uncovering serious vulnera...

What are Ephemeral Accounts? Corporate audits today, for cyber security insurance or compliance, focus on group memberships to identify who has access to what. This process identifies who is a Domain Admin, Enterprise Admin, Local Administrator, Database Global Admin, Global Admin in Azure, and Root Access in AWS. Accounts with this level of access likely have static privilege. I like to call these accounts game-over accounts. If these accounts are compromised, the company will have a massive issue on its hands.  Other account types lurking in your environment can cause this level of damage. Many DevOps accounts and API keys can also cause this level of damage if compromised. DevOps accounts sometimes fall under the radar outside of the scope of compliance and cybersecurity insurance.  The new Privileged Access Management buzzword among vendors, analysts, and operations teams is Ephemeral Accounts . A common phrase I tend to hear is that we don't have static privileged acc...

At some point in the last decade, SIEMs turned into that one friend who always promises to help you move, then shows up late, eats all your pizza, and still expects gas money. They were supposed to deliver centralized visibility and faster investigations. Instead, most SOC teams ended up with endless alerts, eye-watering bills, and dashboards that look impressive on the big screen but don't actually stop attackers. So, how did we end up here? A short history: when SIEMs were actually useful Back when firewalls were still exciting, SIEMs solved a real problem: logs scattered everywhere, auditors breathing down your neck, and no way to answer "who logged into what, when?" Then came the "next-gen" era. Vendors promised smarter detection, correlations across your stack, and even a pinch of threat intel. The promise was fewer false positives and a faster response. But instead of taming noise, NG SIEMs just amplified it. It was like turning up the volume on a broken radio and calling ...